30 December 2010

#2010

Hello to you, you person I likely know and who has been kind enough to humour me in my little ramblings of insanity. This is how I’ve viewed the year that’s nearly passed us by, purely in unimportant, media-y terms.

Film in 2010 was marked by the relentless behemoth of 3D marking its territory like an incontinent puppy, spoiling my love for the art form by reducing the viewing experience to a nausea-inducing gimmick. But that’s my view; here are some films that sort of made a splash, yeah?

Shutter Island came out in February, adapted from a 2003 novel I’ve never heard of, nor heard anyone talk about; Shutter Island was directed by Martin Scorsese and has quickly become one of my all-time favourite films. An absolutely gripping mystery fraught with uncertainty and self-doubt, everyone’s acting their arses off in it, even the sometimes-maligned Leonardo DiCaprio. Nail-biting stuff from beginning to end, the music’s amazing as well, making Hans Zimmer my joint favourite film composer.

In March we had Kick-Ass and ultimately flawed and tiring comic-book adaptation saved only by Nicolas Cage having the time of his life as ‘Big Daddy’. Incidentally I hate Aaron Johnson now; his acting makes me want to slit my own eyeballs open. The Film was ruined with over the top violence, I mean beyond ‘300’ levels of the stuff and completely unnecessary swearing (by which I mean it was put in purely for the shock factor and not because it is something the characters would say fuck-bugger shit-nipple) I hope that they never, ever make a sequel.

May was a mixed month for films; Robin Hood came out, proving that Ridley Scott might have just lost his magic, and that Russell Crowe is really touchy about how shit his accents are. Sex and the City 2 came out, showing us that television adaptations for the big screen don’t generally work the first time, let alone a second. It also let me know that I’ve achieved true equality in my hatred for people, I can (and do) wish harm on these women without it being about misogyny. And Four Lions was released, marking the arrival of Islamic Terrorism and suicide bombing as being fair game in humour. I, for one, am happy about this; religion shouldn’t be vaunted as an untouchable subject, fuck Mini Babybel!

In June Toy Story 3 was a spark of pure joy that reduced well-rounded and emotionally-mature audiences of all genders and ages to floods of tears at the touching depiction of the coming of maturity and death of childhood, another win for Pixar.

July, and your mind was the scene of the crime in Inception; the second entry for Leo DiCaprio and Hans Zimmer in my little list in Christopher Nolan’s ultra high-concept masterpiece of existential uncertainty and big CGI set pieces. Also in July; M. Night Shyamalan showed us why he hasn’t made a film that’s even passable since Unbreakable in 2000. M. Night Shyamatalan wrote and directed the adaptation to the cartoon ‘Avatar: The Last Airbender’ and made a mockery (apparently) of it. He claimed that European audiences were the only ones to get him, but proved he didn’t get them when he kept inserting reference to ‘benders’ (people who can manipulate the elements) into his script. This means that M. Night Shyamarmalade’s film had some memorable scenes and lines such as one where a man is dragged away from his father’s throne room, but on recognising a potential assassin in the room yells “He’s a bender!”, or “I always knew you were a bender.” or my personal favourite, “There are some really powerful benders in the Northern Water Zone.” M. Night Shyamagnesium phosphate, you are an arse.

The Human Centipede disgusted and delighted people with a trailer alone. The tale of a mad German scientist who wants to join people from the mouth to the anus to create a ‘human centipede’ the trailer got everyone talking about the sheer disgusting nature of it all and ultimately showed them my viewpoint on the rest of ‘society’.

October inevitably arrived and with it, ‘The Social Network’ a more or less fictionalised account of the foundation of Facebook; the film marks the point at which social networking is cemented as a real cultural movement, an artefact of the first decade of this putrid century. I’m looking forward to Twitter: The Movie, which will likely consist of some nerds looking at Facebook saying “But I want money as well!” until shifting to show Stephen Fry tapping at a keyboard for 4 and a half hours.

And in November the first part of the adaptation of the final book of the Harry Potter series, otherwise known as Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 came out, making otherwise rational people scream like banshees. The film features a bobble-headed version of Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson’s eyebrows, expect the second part in July next year.

2010 was the endpoint for a number of big television dramas; some have been almost irresistibly touted for a big-screen outing like sponsored terrorism-a-thon ‘24’, while others are simply over, either sadly or with good reason.

Arguably the biggest TV death of the year was that of David Tennant, or rather his portrayal as the supremely popular tenth incarnation of The Doctor in Doctor Who. Child’s drawing of himself Matt Smith stepped into some ocean-sized shoes and was met with immediate hatred, by me at least. Of course by about the twelfth minute of his own debut adventure I had been won round, as had the legion fans that had gathered since the show’s return in 2005.

Ashes to Ashes ended in May, revealing that the world of Gene Hunt was actually a kind of pre-afterlife specifically for the police with Gene being some sort of modern-day Charon, ferrying dead coppers to the pub…that is literally what he does.

Exercise in headless chicken scriptwriting Lost ended in similar fashion also in May with what has been one of the most dissatisfying and unwelcome endings since the Sopranos ended mid-sen-

The Tudors ended 4 series of historical lies and mischaracterisation, oversimplification and downright ‘Hollyoaks-ifying’ of the reign of King Henry VIII. Good.

And just this month, no-one’s favourite show Medium was confirmed as cancelled, alright it ends in 2011, but the announcement was this year, what do you want from me!? Arsehole.

And now some shows you might not have watched/heard of:
Hamlet-inspired Californian-biker epic Sons of Anarchy continued into its third season following the last remaining storyline threads, which unfortunately meant the main character of Jax Teller (played by Geordie actor Charlie Hunnam) going to Northern Ireland with all his biker friends in pursuit of the Real IRA who have kidnapped his baby son. I say unfortunately because this prompted some of the most piss-poor Irish accents I’ve ever heard; fake ones I mean, this is meant to be Belfast and it sounds like they’re auditioning for the part of a cartoon leprechaun. It’s painful to hear, which is a shame as otherwise it’s a very good show, of note is this season’s stand-out guest star Paula Malcolmson, who is, as it happens actually from Belfast.

Lie to me* began its third season; not sure how well-known Lie to me* is, but it deserves more. It’s your standard investigative show, the distinctive feature of which is, apart from Tim Roth seemingly having the time of his life playing arrogant but somehow likeable genius Dr. Cal Lightman, that the investigation is done by a team of experts and experts-in-training that study ‘micro-expressions’ in the face and body language to tell when people are telling the truth or if they’re experiencing (and trying to conceal) specific emotions. It’s better than I’ve made it sound, honestly.

On to technology and the world’s most expensive dinner tray; the iPad was announced by recently reanimated corpse Steve Jobs in January, and the press conference alone was enough to make me want to fire jets of my own scorching pancreatic juices across the Atlantic Ocean to find him and scald his fingers off. Essentially a giant iPhone, but without the practical applications of the easy to use, compact gadget, the iPad’s greatest flaw, in my eyes, is that it somehow makes Apple whores feel smug without the usual qualification of having done something to feel smug about.

The world’s top brand showed it is utterly unfazed by complete failure when it rolled out Google Wave to the public, which it claimed was what “…email would look like if it were invented today.”. Essentially a sort of Frankenstein’s monster stitching together of  e-mail, instant messaging, wikis, and social networking, Google Wave proved too technical for normal human beings to use, being far better suited to some sort of mass intelligence housed in a computer the size of the sun. Development ended in August; try not to cry too much, robots.

Speaking of social networking; the world lost its mind this year when it was revealed that that personal information you so readily entered into a website run by people you don’t know might not have been so secure after all. Facebook’s privacy debacle hasn’t done much to stop new users signing up, nor indeed to cause a mass exodus, MySpace-style. I think I’d mind more if the private, personal information they garnered from my profile was of any use to them, but, as it seems, the personalised adverts that I get, the ones tailored to my social situation and are deemed relevant to me are for Orthodox Jewish dating…I’m not Jewish, Orthodox or otherwise. When they get scary good at pulling my information, then I’ll give a shit.

Video games this year continued their trend as the most lucrative media launches of all-time, that’s in monetary terms you understand, try and talk about video games in company outside the age range of 11-29 and you’re likely to be sneered at with the kind of derision usually reserved for people who start sentences with “I’m not a racist, but…” Here are some developments I’m not happy about:

Sony and Microsoft, both eyeing Nintendo’s causal gamer audience with bizarre envy, launch their competing add-ons to their consoles. Kinect for XBOX360 and PlayStation Move are both attempts at the player using their own bodily movements to play games, sounds good to the kind of twat who thinks all entertainment should take place on a treadmill, i.e. no one. But what it serves to do is make every twat-head who uses it look like Louie Spence without the modicum of likeability or talent. Ah, feels good to get that out of my system, now, onto some titles.

Red Dead Redemption came out in May after a few years heavy speculation and proved to be one of the best things ever made out of 1’s and 0’s. The story is set in the waning days of the American Old West where you, as John Marston, are blackmailed into taking down your old gang members by a couple of ruthless federal agents, taking John from the prairie to the Mexican revolution and on to the modern society at odds with gun slinging outlaws, RDR proved to be a wonderful looking, fun, thoughtful and downright moving game that will be looked on fondly for years to come.

Halo: Reach unsurprisingly was a huge success, despite the fact that all titles in the series after the original 2001 outing ‘Halo: Combat Evolved’ have been accurately judged as self-important, stagnant crap by any gamers with more than two neurons to rub together. Halo: Reach serves as a prequel to the rest of the series, taking place on the colony of Reach, which players of previous games will know, was a massive military defeat for the human forces of the UNSC against a multi-species army known as the Covenant. Now the fact that it takes place in such a doomed scenario means that you’re playing the game with the full knowledge, especially if you’ve ever seen any war film EVER, that you, your team-mates the supporting cast that don’t appear in the main series, are all going to die…probably. Having criticised the series as a whole, Reach does sit as the bright spark in the family, a much better game than previous entries with a story that doesn’t bore you at any turn despite its collection of clichés. It’ll live on as a multiplayer relic for years, which angers me greatly, but it is a good game.

Call of Duty: Black Ops, the biggest, most over hyped of all games released ever that didn’t involve Peter Molyneux, was released in November and morons everywhere would have kicked children over walls to get a copy. The jealous younger brother series of the actually good Call of Duty games, Black Ops was developed by Treyarch, who also previously made the World at War entry. Black Ops’ campaign surprisingly consists of a series of ‘Black Ops’ taking place in various situations of the Cold War, and that’s about it really. It’s the multiplayer aspect, which I’ve never played, that is most definitely the main reason for about 98% of all purchases of the title, which in my opinion, should be seen as ridiculous as buying a DVD you’ve never seen before, melting down the film and only keeping the ‘special features’ disc.

If you want games to be taken seriously then multiplayer has to be a fun aside, not the main feature of the game.

And finally, Heavy Rain was released in February, and deserves mention here as the realisation of something promised to people my age years ago. Alright so the plot sounds like a rejected proposal for a B-movie knock-off of Se7en, but Heavy Rain, a game about a serial killer who drowns children in rain water, was presented in a compelling, new way, playing out entirely as a narrative, the player, as one of four characters throughout the game, interacts with scenes by pressing the appropriate button at the correct moment in order to progress the scene, failing to press the right button will still push the plot along, but in a slightly different way and always in a cinematic and believable way. Now, those of you in the know will know that that means it’s a game made entirely of quick-time events, but that’s not the point. The point is that Heavy Rain plays like a film, with real dialogue and proper camera-work. It is what people in the nineties used to say to older generations when trying to explain what video games were, an ‘interactive movie’.

And that was the year in media for me. Whether you agree or disagree, I’d rather stick a fork in my eye than have an argument about it.

30 November 2010

We wanted to go to LA but we were headed for Spain.

Patrick Kielty,

I have a task for you; when Michael McIntyre fucks off (like I told him to) can you follow him please?

18 November 2010

I am what I am; and what I am needs no excuses.

Gay anthem there. But it's an ever-so-slightly witty reference to today's ra...well, it actually isn't a rant today.

I first became aware of it on March the 12th of this year via a tweet of Trent Reznor's (of Nine Inch Nails)


This was, of course, before I quit Twitter for the first time (I've done this twice now) but that's beside the point, the point is, one of my musical heroes was talking about something that I had never heard of, and it was, apparently, something that people thought he might be involved in. My interest was peaked, so I typed 'iamamiwhoami' into Google and Google directed me to the YouTube profile of iamamiwhoami.

I had a search around to get a grasp of what the fuss was about and found very little information at all, in fact, there was patently none. 

This was the first video I saw and also the first one uploaded.



Now please. What the fuck was that? Nice mellow trance-electronic music, and a video of a woman in black in a dark hole in a pool of water with limbs coming out of trees. Oh and what about that goat? Originally this had a video of a goat giving birth tacked onto the end but the uppity person who owned the video complained. And those numbers in the title, correspond to letters in the alphabet and spell out the word '
"educational".

Well I was truly intrigued now, as I always am by mystery, at first it reminded me of Nine Inch Nails BRILLIANT ARG (Alternative Reality Game) for their 2007 album 'Year Zero' which involved phone numbers, a multitude of websites, sonic analysis, mp3 files that had to be decoded, real life gigs, it was brilliant, and this seemed like the same thing. Well it isn't. Here's the second one.



Yeah, it's weird all right. the woman in the water is covered in some sort of mud and licks a tree, that then oozes white sap. And I don't think it's a Freudian interpretation by me that concludes that the sap is meant to look like semen and the knot in the tree is meant to look like a vagina. The animal is an owl (for inexplicable reasons as of the uploading of this video) and the numbers in the title spell out "iam"

After looking at that one I decided to look up other sites as to maybe shed some light on what I had of course assumed was some viral campaign for a new musical artist or album. Sure enough there were forums and articles rife with supposed 'evidence' that the artist behind these videos was Lady Gaga, Christina Aguilera, Trent Reznor, Little Boots, Goldfrapp and, the closest answer to the truth, The Knife. All of whom are not involved at all.

Here's number three.



Weirder still, strawberry cakes in a pool of water with a thrashing figure in it. This one's animal is a whale and its numbers say "itsme"

Number four.



What? Its animal is a bee and its numbers spell "mandragora".

By this point most interested people are ignoring the content of the videos with regards to what they might mean and are only concerned with the identity of the artist, who they assume is also the mud-covered woman. Here's another baffling video, the fifth.



Hooray! The strawberries are back and...we don't know what that means. What we do know is this video's animal is a llama and its numbers spell out "offiicinarum". Now that is a massive clue, when combined with the word from the previous video, 'mandragora' it becomes the latin name for the mandrake plant, the roots of which have a deep connection to folklore, because they can occasionally resemble a humanoid shape. So maybe the videos are all about mandrakes?

Here's the final of these 'prelude' videos and one that doesn't so much clear anything up as throw dust in your eyes and beat you about the head until you're thoroughly disoriented.



Yeah, I don't know either.But if you're following so far, this one's animal was a money and its numbers say "welcomehome". And did she say "Why?" or "Y"?

After this video there was a long-ish break of two weeks before the next video. Some of the more outlandish theories on who the lead singer was died away when they themselves or their publicity people denied any involvement and another heretofore unknown candidate was put forth based, of all things, on her teeth; some people started to say it was a little-known Swedish indie-pop singer-songwriter by the name of Jonna Lee.

Since the beginning of the campaign (if that is what it is) an MTV journalist by the name of James Montgomery had blogged about it. His was certainly the widest exposure the project had had so far. Creepily enough a package was sent to him at his desk at MTV that contained some chips of balsa wood, a strip of paper and a piece of human hair.


Now, Montgomery was stumped and later would criticise the entire project for being too long and too mysterious, so I call him a sour twat. But it did tell us that the animals meant something, and they meant something when put together.

A new video appeared on the 14th of March and it was unlike any of the previous ones, no animal, no numbers, and it appeared to be a full song. I'm going to put a whole bunch of them now, they were uploaded over the space of about 5 months.















Phew, that was a slog eh? So how much did you notice? Well yes, it spelled out BOUNTY and when 't' came out the faithful who'd stuck with the project began searching like mad for 'iambounty' finding a website www.iambounty.com that has displayed the same image (a drawing of a hand doing the American sign language for the letter 'b') from then until the at least the time of this post. The more investigative of them even performed a whois query and found that the site was in fact set up by none other than Jonna Lee. Well the mysterious woman's face was revealed and yes, it was Jonna Lee after all. And did you also notice that each video contained the words 'to whom it may concern'? Well that ends up being quite important.

What is abundantly clear is that music is a major part of whatever this is, but the videos aren't just there as music videos, they're just as important as the music, so it transcends being just another electronic concept album and reaches into the echelons of art. Each of these songs (or singles maybe?) have been released to iTunes by the way so if you really want them...there you go.

Over the past few weeks (as of the 18th of November) a few videos have been taken down, not for any breaking of YouTube's rules reason but for...narrative reasons. I'll do my best to explain from memory.

On the 1st of October 
a video titled "20101001" was uploaded calling for one volunteer from the YouTube community. This volunteer would be our representative who would give their name, telephone number and home address by the 8th of October. The video also gave us a link to http://towhomitmayconcern.cc/ (now dead) that appeared to promote an upcoming live performance.

Three days later a new video appeared, now this one hasn't been removed so I can put it on here you lucky shits.




If the previous videos had not convinced the community, then this has to be utter confirmation that the 'story' of the videos is that of the myths of the mandrake plant. In that video we see a hanged man, his semen dripping into a plant pot (representing the ground) from which springs a person. This comes from the folklore of the mandrake whereby a mandrake is made by the semen of condemned men, as people had noticed that it can happen that the hanged involuntary ejaculate. Of course Michael Hutchence and David Carradine knew that as well.

The next video, entitled '20101109' continues right where 20101104 left off, the woman descends the spiral staircase until she reaches a phone, above it is a printed out letter from the YouTube representative 'Tehhills' informing iamamiwhoami that she couldn't attend because she didn't have a passport (amongst other reasons) and that she endorsed the user 'ShootUpTheStation' in her place. Scrawled underneath that was ShootUpTheStation's (or SUTS as the community have dubbed him) phone number. The woman dials, slowly, then twirls the cord in her finger while it rings. A man answers and the woman tells him to turn on his camera, the scene shifts to that of a low-quality webcam and we see a young man, faced away from the screen, blonde, apparently German, this is SUTS. The woman asks him about himself and his beliefs, she then tells him he must record his journey and hangs up.

Over the next four days the videos are all in the style of a webcam 'vlog'.

101112 shows us SUTS' journey from Germany to Sweden. On arrival he gets in a car and is driven...somewhere.


101112-2 Shows us that 'somewhere' was a hotel. SUTS enters his room and reads an envelope addressed only 'to whom it may concern'. In the envelope is a piece of paper, an itenerary, each day is busy with 'Visits' and a 'Talk.'


In 101113 SUTS answers the phone in his hotel room. Music plays in the background and there is a knock at the door. SUTS answers and the camera shows us only his bed, the sound of plastic and masking tape is heard, we hear a camera go off and the video ends with an arm that does not belong to SUTS turning off the camera.


In 101114: A bearded man with a blurred-out face teaches SUTS to waltz and bow. In complete silence. After the man shakes SUTS' hand and leaves.


In 101115: A man arrives with a plastic bag of clothes, which he lays out on SUTS' bed, he leaves. SUTS shows us the dark clothing.


The next video was not a SUTS vlog style video. It was entitled http://towhomitmayconcern.cc/ (a link that is now dead) and, matching the background of a cork noticeboard that was present on that website. A woman's voice (presumably Jonna's) speaks, "At 12:01 AM Swedish time we act in concert on the wish to evolve. We will present you with a plausible path available for 6 hours on 'It Is What It Is'."


One more video appeared on the iamamiwhoami YouTube channel, it was called 101115-2 and showed us the now-familiar sight of SUTS' hotel room, SUTS can be heard talking on the telephone, telling whoever is on the other end that his webcam is on. There is a knock at the door. The video ends.


And that is all I have to tell you about iamamiwhoami. The mystery continues, since December of 2009, nearly a year, these videos have plagued my brain, my dreams, my waking thoughts, even my nightmares. I'm left questioning everything. Is it a marketing ploy? Is it art? Is SUTS in on it? Or is he a real, normal person?


I'm starting to think I may never know the truth. What the story is. What it all means. What it's for.


But I've enjoyed the ride.


P.S. the story isn't over. Just after the promised time of 12.01 Swedish time, a concert appeared on http://towhomitmayconcern.cc/ it was up for two hours less than the promised six hours. I was unable to see it 'live' but I did see it the following morning via download. If you like what you've seen on this blog post, if it interests you and you want to know more, there is something I can give you. Something I am not responsible for you seeing. The concert.